Updates
In response to some emails, I have posted updates to the Phoenix urban heat island post.
In response to some emails, I have posted updates to the Phoenix urban heat island post.
Bad Behavior has blocked 1514 access attempts in the last 7 days.
TCO:
It’s a start. But still rather defensive of your fundamental CONFUSION of an effect versus the impact of that effect over time in the aggregate. No one is debating the existence of a large UHI in Phoenix. It’s juvinile to argue on the topic of the latter by showing that it is large now, without doing math and showing effects over time and all that, because, the CURRENT LARGE UHI in Phoenix is not debated! Cripes, man.
February 24, 2008, 4:03 pmTony Edwards:
TCO. Other than being excessively abrasive, and a little lacking in spelling in your juvinile (sic) comments, would you be so kind as to show the rest of us where this large UHI effect has been accounted for in the official records?
February 25, 2008, 4:12 pmLarry Sheldon:
Tony Edwards: I have what I think is a more productive idea.
I think Steve should just simply ban “TCO”.
No, that would not be “censoring”. That would be “noise filtering”.
February 25, 2008, 4:23 pmTCO:
The Phoenix UHI documentation was already cited 7 days ago (comment number 4 on this thread: http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/a-junior-high-s.html#comments
Sorry for the abrasiveness.
February 25, 2008, 7:41 pmaaron:
Posted this comment on the other thread and figured I should repost it here:
[sorry for the abrasiveness]
February 26, 2008, 1:40 pmLarry Sheldon:
Geewhiz, some people can’t get anything right.
I just noticed that I spelled “Warren” S-T-E-V-E.
How rude.
February 26, 2008, 3:29 pmTCO:
Steve has banned me before. Warren is getting some real libertarian street cred by allowing me to run amok. Trampling the gentle flowers.
February 26, 2008, 5:01 pm