Comments on: Warming and Soot http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:51:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Hasan http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html/comment-page-1#comment-7563 Hasan Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:39:58 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1624#comment-7563 If this is true, then the recent decline of sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean might be the result of the activity in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Over the past 10 years they have stripped off the forest cover, burned the trees and set up a huge operation refining oilsands. If this is true, then the recent decline of sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean might be the result of the activity in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Over the past 10 years they have stripped off the forest cover, burned the trees and set up a huge operation refining oilsands.

]]> By: hunter http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html/comment-page-1#comment-7227 hunter Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:12:34 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1624#comment-7227 Ha ha ha, you advanced the hypothesis did you? How hilariously deranged you really are. "we know how to have a prosperous fossil fuel powered economy without soot but we don’t know how to have one without CO2." What a stupid piece of shit you are, really. We do in fact know how to have a prosperous economy powered by things other than fossil fuels. It's clear that your world view doesn't include anything outside the US, to the extent that you are utterly ignorant of places like Iceland, or Norway, or France. Truly pathetic. Ha ha ha, you advanced the hypothesis did you? How hilariously deranged you really are.

“we know how to have a prosperous fossil fuel powered economy without soot but we don’t know how to have one without CO2.”

What a stupid piece of shit you are, really. We do in fact know how to have a prosperous economy powered by things other than fossil fuels. It’s clear that your world view doesn’t include anything outside the US, to the extent that you are utterly ignorant of places like Iceland, or Norway, or France. Truly pathetic.

]]> By: hunter http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html/comment-page-1#comment-7122 hunter Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:20:36 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1624#comment-7122 The $50billion wasted on AGW fear mongering could have developed a good and affordable technological fix for soot reduction by now. The opportunity cost the AGW promtoers have imposed on the world is quite high. The $50billion wasted on AGW fear mongering could have developed a good and affordable technological fix for soot reduction by now.
The opportunity cost the AGW promtoers have imposed on the world is quite high.

]]> By: John Moore http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html/comment-page-1#comment-7080 John Moore Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:04:35 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1624#comment-7080 Pielke has a <a href="http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/new-report-on-the-role-of-soot-on-the-climate-in-the-higher-latitudes-and-on-global-warming/" rel="nofollow">link</a> related to this subject. Pielke has a link related to this subject.

]]> By: Greg http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/12/warming-and-soot.html/comment-page-1#comment-7067 Greg Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:05:45 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1624#comment-7067 "...as we know how to have a prosperous fossil fuel powered economy without soot but we don’t know how to have one without CO2." So why is the entirety of the control argument centered on CO2 instead of the stuff that's easier to control? Assuming that it's even desirable to control CO2 in the first place? “…as we know how to have a prosperous fossil fuel powered economy without soot but we don’t know how to have one without CO2.”

So why is the entirety of the control argument centered on CO2 instead of the stuff that’s easier to control? Assuming that it’s even desirable to control CO2 in the first place?

]]>