When you read the science, you’ll find it to be well known that the Earth experiences 30-35 year temperature cycles. Thus any ‘climatologist’ who supposedly didn’t know this would be considered a fool amongst their colleagues.

In fact, if this is your job, you can’t NOT know about Earth’s 30-35 year temperature cycles!

Thus many scientists have been waiting for this latest warming ‘wave’ within the greater ‘tide’ to break, which is very likely what we are seeing right now with all of this record winter weather around the world. It snowed last year in Baghdad, for crying out loud – first time in 100 years!! And now England is snowed in, and the fraudsters have not-so-subtly changed their rhetoric from ‘Global Warming’ to ‘Climate Change Crisis’.

But this is only a re-branding of their fraud. Al Gore and crew attempted to use an upward fluctuation in this cycle to spread terror for power and profit, just as Inca and Mayan Priests once used their knowledge of eclipses to intimidate their populations, and pretend a direct connection to God.

The motives of this are plain : Al Gore has a Carbon Credit Exchange waiting in the wings, developed with David Blood and, early in its development, Ken Lay of Enron. These two crooks have already played key roles in collapsing our economies, in their quest for profits under the new ‘Scarcity Capitalism’ Lay was so fond of, and we are about to hand over our economies to their sinister, vile, greedy machinations.

If you look back at the only really solid data we have, which of course only covers the last 100 years or so – you will see the two previous cycles were a little longer than this one. If you go long range, you see that overall, we ARE in a warming cycle. It’s been warmer centuries ago, it’s hardly a bad thing, there’s nothing we can do about it anyway, so we prepare, is all. Big deal.

But this game plays out like this – it’s not ’settled science’, but it is still fairly well known that the latest upward swing would lead to a dip – and we would have a carbon tax imposed just in time for a 35 year downswing in temperatures, when our energy needs would skyrocket. The payout would go beyond bags of money. It would be Global Fascism at it’s purest and finest.

Thus they started to go into the schools in the 90’s, to indoctrinate a generation of children in their fraudulent cult – it’s easy to see that it’s been nothing less than timed, if you just do a little ‘hindcasting of your own. If this natural upward fluctuation in temperature cycles were to have lasted an extra year or two – assuming we are looking at the onset of the dip we should be and would be expecting if we had honest leaders who weren’t trying to enslave us with phony science – there would be an army of self-hating eco-police coming out to do battle against evil polluting humanity over the next decade and all the laws would have been in place.

It is nothing less than FOOLISH to abandon one source of energy without first developing another. To attempt to force the issue with a blatant scientific fraud destroys any alleged value in such an effort – in case you forgot, Stalin taught us the true meaning of “The End Justifies The Means”.

What Al Gore and the rest of the Climate Clown Cabal did – and are still trying to do! – is TREASON. Anybody remember what that is? Well, I’ll give you a hint – before there can be treason, you need to still have a country first.

The social and criminal repercussions of the fudging, however should become quite tangible and not be allowed to escape our grasp and punishment. Climate cheaters should be exposed, tried and given their due.

I’m beginning to think we’re in for an ice age after all

Actual Measured Temperature Increase: 0.3C
Adjustments and Fudge Factors: 0.5F = 0.3C
Total Reported Warming: 0.6C

Am I correct? If so, it is still worth reporting, but it should be done correctly.

Second, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration explains their methodology for adjusting raw data:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/#urbanization

Please note that instead of adjusting Reno’s ‘min temp’ downward to conform to Reno’s 1997 & 1998 ‘non-heat island’ temperature, the NOAA adjusted upwards to conform to Reno’s ‘heat island’ temperature record. While the NOAA claims “impact of urbanization and other changes in land use is likely small,” their adjustments seem to demonstrate that Reno’s adjusted temperature records are overstated by 4-5 degrees F. compared to what they would be if the thermometer was not situated within Reno’s heat island.

– Robert Moen, http://www.energyplanUSA.com