<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Twenty Guys Behind the Curtain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/the-twenty-guys-behind-the-curtain.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/the-twenty-guys-behind-the-curtain.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the other coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/the-twenty-guys-behind-the-curtain.html/comment-page-1#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>the other coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1495#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s this for a laugh, in the wake of Climategate. Kevin Trenberth trying to make the case for global warming by saying &quot;well, the IPCC said it&#039;s so, so it must be so&quot; (but somehow failing to mention that he IS the IPCC) and &quot;Scientists are skeptics and would never collude for their own selfish gains. And of course they harshly and skeptically review each other&#039;s work.&quot;  Reading this made Coke come out my nose. And it&#039;s only from February, 2008.

http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s this for a laugh, in the wake of Climategate. Kevin Trenberth trying to make the case for global warming by saying &#8220;well, the IPCC said it&#8217;s so, so it must be so&#8221; (but somehow failing to mention that he IS the IPCC) and &#8220;Scientists are skeptics and would never collude for their own selfish gains. And of course they harshly and skeptically review each other&#8217;s work.&#8221;  Reading this made Coke come out my nose. And it&#8217;s only from February, 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/Trenberth/XchangeGray_FtCollinsFeb08.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agesilaus</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/the-twenty-guys-behind-the-curtain.html/comment-page-1#comment-6105</link>
		<dc:creator>agesilaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1495#comment-6105</guid>
		<description>There must be missing emails, Hansen is absent and we know that he closely worked with CRU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There must be missing emails, Hansen is absent and we know that he closely worked with CRU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

