<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wedding Function Venues</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5930</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding Function Venues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5930</guid>
		<description>Wow! its really nice and quite informative presentation. I would like to attend your next lecture live not presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! its really nice and quite informative presentation. I would like to attend your next lecture live not presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell C</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5920</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5920</guid>
		<description>Great presentation! The visual analogies for negative &amp; positive feedbacks was especially enlightening. I&#039;ll see what I can do about prompting invites to speak on behalf of various policy makers I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great presentation! The visual analogies for negative &amp; positive feedbacks was especially enlightening. I&#8217;ll see what I can do about prompting invites to speak on behalf of various policy makers I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5919</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5919</guid>
		<description>Thank Warren Meyer,

I appreciated your lecture this week.  It was informative and consolidated many of the the questions and issues which continue to evolve over time.

I would appreciate your comments or inputs about the AZ Republic&#039;s article on the Arizona
CO2 increases.

There was no mention as to where or how the increase in AZ CO2 was  measured.  To me, measurements are everything.   How, when, where, What technology, number of samples over time, degree of accuracy and standards (recovery) tests to validate the data are all critical when you start talking about concentrations.  Who conducted the testing?

No mention of 350 PPM levels anywhere in the state.  What if the number was less than 350 PPM in Phoenix?  Does that matter?  

Also the smoke stacks photo on the front page of the Republic were meant to infer that we were seeing CO2?   Not likely, since it is not a visible compound.  No mention of water vapor as another source of greenhouse gases, (from your lecture) which is what we were most likely seeing in the photo.

Keep up the good work!

Donald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank Warren Meyer,</p>
<p>I appreciated your lecture this week.  It was informative and consolidated many of the the questions and issues which continue to evolve over time.</p>
<p>I would appreciate your comments or inputs about the AZ Republic&#8217;s article on the Arizona<br />
CO2 increases.</p>
<p>There was no mention as to where or how the increase in AZ CO2 was  measured.  To me, measurements are everything.   How, when, where, What technology, number of samples over time, degree of accuracy and standards (recovery) tests to validate the data are all critical when you start talking about concentrations.  Who conducted the testing?</p>
<p>No mention of 350 PPM levels anywhere in the state.  What if the number was less than 350 PPM in Phoenix?  Does that matter?  </p>
<p>Also the smoke stacks photo on the front page of the Republic were meant to infer that we were seeing CO2?   Not likely, since it is not a visible compound.  No mention of water vapor as another source of greenhouse gases, (from your lecture) which is what we were most likely seeing in the photo.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADiff</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5915</link>
		<dc:creator>ADiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5915</guid>
		<description>Excellent and informative presentation.  It was well worth the time.  Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and informative presentation.  It was well worth the time.  Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5907</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5907</guid>
		<description>That was an outstanding lecture and I hope a lot more people can hear and watch it.

I also liked the way you handled some of the more wacky questioners. You managed to provide good information without making them seem silly, and yet without giving credit to their fantasies. 

Keep up the good work.

Kudos to the kids too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an outstanding lecture and I hope a lot more people can hear and watch it.</p>
<p>I also liked the way you handled some of the more wacky questioners. You managed to provide good information without making them seem silly, and yet without giving credit to their fantasies. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>Kudos to the kids too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Greene</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/thanks.html/comment-page-1#comment-5901</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1395#comment-5901</guid>
		<description>Hey i really wanted to come to your lecture today but i got a job...hehe. I Would be honored if you came into my bar and let me buy u a drink. i work at Magnums At 7th st and union hills. see ya around some time. oh yeah put me on red list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey i really wanted to come to your lecture today but i got a job&#8230;hehe. I Would be honored if you came into my bar and let me buy u a drink. i work at Magnums At 7th st and union hills. see ya around some time. oh yeah put me on red list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

