Comments on: Roy Spencer: Top 10 Annoyances in the Climate Debate http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Stonyground http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6164 Stonyground Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:47:29 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6164 Thanks for that hunter. It would appear that the warmists now have as much credibility as the Bishop of Carlisle saying that the floods are the result of us not taking our gay-bashing seriosly enough. Thanks for that hunter. It would appear that the warmists now have as much credibility as the Bishop of Carlisle saying that the floods are the result of us not taking our gay-bashing seriosly enough.

]]> By: hunter http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6129 hunter Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:18:34 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6129 stonyground, Since the models actually say nothing, they can be made to say anything. They are as useful as, although much more expensive than, reading entrails. stonyground,
Since the models actually say nothing, they can be made to say anything.
They are as useful as, although much more expensive than, reading entrails.

]]> By: Stonyground http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6122 Stonyground Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:22:47 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6122 I have just read an annoying little article at Times Online entitled "Flushing out the High Priests of Climate Change". The heading would suggest a serious commentry on the significance of Climategate but is in fact a rather dishonest attempt to downplay the issue. The article also states that the heavy rain that has recently hit North West England was predicted by climate change models, is this true? or is it a case of fitting events to the theory after they have happened? I have just read an annoying little article at Times Online entitled “Flushing out the High Priests of Climate Change”. The heading would suggest a serious commentry on the significance of Climategate but is in fact a rather dishonest attempt to downplay the issue.

The article also states that the heavy rain that has recently hit North West England was predicted by climate change models, is this true? or is it a case of fitting events to the theory after they have happened?

]]> By: Will http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6120 Will Sun, 29 Nov 2009 07:23:51 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6120 THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate. It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own. So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news. Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE And http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk If you have a Facebook page post the two links. Will THIS IS A CALL TO ACTION
We have been given a powerful tool in the form of GlimateGate.
It now has a name and has the potential to get a life of its own.
So if the mains stream media is not going to report on this then let us use the social Facebook and emails to spread the news.
Send the following two YouTube videos to two people that you know and ask them to send it onto at least 2 others.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE
And
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk

If you have a Facebook page post the two links.

Will

]]> By: Jim http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6117 Jim Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:18:38 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6117 Add researchers throwing out the original data! http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/ Add researchers throwing out the original data!
http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.com/

]]> By: dearieme http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6110 dearieme Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:01:55 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6110 Since my joke went down quite well on The Air Vent, I repeat it here: I'm not a denier, I'm a refutenik. Since my joke went down quite well on The Air Vent, I repeat it here:
I’m not a denier, I’m a refutenik.

]]> By: Fred from Canuckistan . . . http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6109 Fred from Canuckistan . . . Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:47:32 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6109 I want to be a "Water Wet Denier" someday. when I grow up. :) I want to be a “Water Wet Denier” someday.

when I grow up.

:)

]]> By: John A http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/roy-spencer-top-10-annoyances-in-the-climate-debate.html/comment-page-1#comment-6108 John A Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:08:19 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1512#comment-6108 The conclusion of 7 - "The implication is clear: if the data do not agree with the models, it must be the data’s fault." - erm, was that not <i>explicitly</i> stated in one of the first-to-be-extracted CRU Emails? The conclusion of 7 – “The implication is clear: if the data do not agree with the models, it must be the data’s fault.” – erm, was that not explicitly stated in one of the first-to-be-extracted CRU Emails?

]]>