<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missing the Point, Perhaps on Purpose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/missing-the-point-perhaps-on-purpose.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/missing-the-point-perhaps-on-purpose.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/missing-the-point-perhaps-on-purpose.html/comment-page-1#comment-6062</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1481#comment-6062</guid>
		<description>I think their position sums up the state of modern climate science perfectly:
A little bit of unethical behavior, in the cause of the popular consensus, is OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think their position sums up the state of modern climate science perfectly:<br />
A little bit of unethical behavior, in the cause of the popular consensus, is OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred from Canuckistan . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/11/missing-the-point-perhaps-on-purpose.html/comment-page-1#comment-6061</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred from Canuckistan . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1481#comment-6061</guid>
		<description>someone  the &quot;American Meteorological Society&quot;  needs some serious ethics training in ethics.


Anyone or any group that says a little bit of fraud is ok is just plain wrong.

Maybe Congress needs to look into the AMS operations.

After all, where there is ethics smoke, there is likely to be fraud fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone  the &#8220;American Meteorological Society&#8221;  needs some serious ethics training in ethics.</p>
<p>Anyone or any group that says a little bit of fraud is ok is just plain wrong.</p>
<p>Maybe Congress needs to look into the AMS operations.</p>
<p>After all, where there is ethics smoke, there is likely to be fraud fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
