Comments on: The Single Best Reason Not To Fear a Climate Catastrophe http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/the-single-best-reason-not-to-fear-a-climate-catastrophe.html Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Graphite http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/the-single-best-reason-not-to-fear-a-climate-catastrophe.html/comment-page-1#comment-5818 Graphite Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:01:58 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1333#comment-5818 "it will be interesting to see how desperate the rationalisations become before they admit it." If only it were just 'interesting'! Meanwhile they are spending billions of our tax £/$ on King Canute style holding back the waves, whilst denying aid and cheap power to billions of under priviledged people around the globe! - It's heartbreaking! “it will be interesting to see how desperate the rationalisations become before they admit it.”

If only it were just ‘interesting’! Meanwhile they are spending billions of our tax £/$ on King Canute style holding back the waves, whilst denying aid and cheap power to billions of under priviledged people around the globe! – It’s heartbreaking!

]]> By: Stonyground http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/the-single-best-reason-not-to-fear-a-climate-catastrophe.html/comment-page-1#comment-5799 Stonyground Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:11:43 +0000 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1333#comment-5799 I would be interested to know what the reasons are for assuming the positive feedback model. That the global climate has been sufficiently stable to sustain life for billions of years would strongly suggest that if anything negative feedback models should be used. I would expect that any evidence for assuming otherwise would have to be very robust indeed. The aerosol hypothosis that is being used to cover the gap between the computer models and reality sound like desperation to me. I suppose only time will tell, If they are wrong it will be interesting to see how desperate the rationalisations become before they admit it. I would be interested to know what the reasons are for assuming the positive feedback model. That the global climate has been sufficiently stable to sustain life for billions of years would strongly suggest that if anything negative feedback models should be used. I would expect that any evidence for assuming otherwise would have to be very robust indeed. The aerosol hypothosis that is being used to cover the gap between the computer models and reality sound like desperation to me. I suppose only time will tell, If they are wrong it will be interesting to see how desperate the rationalisations become before they admit it.

]]>