<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reminder:  November 10 Phoenix Climate Presentation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5863</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5863</guid>
		<description>Broken link: Blog Action Day for Climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broken link: Blog Action Day for Climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dardinger</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dardinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5849</guid>
		<description>Rather sad that bad language is allowed here.  Makes me appreciate Steve McIntyre&#039;s firm insistence on some degree of civility at Climate Audit.  OTOH, I do agree 100% with the point that there must be negative feedbacks which kick in at some point, and most probably are already at work.  The fact is that CO2 levels in the recent past (geologically speaking) are near the minimum which is possible.  Any lower and life is negatively impacted.  The first couple of CO2 doublings are primarily going to result in shifting the water cycle to adjust.  Part of the problem, as far as explaining this to AGW zealots, is that a lot of the adjustment involves moving larger amounts of heat poleward and this can be called Global Warming as opposed to Regional Adjustment to Warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather sad that bad language is allowed here.  Makes me appreciate Steve McIntyre&#8217;s firm insistence on some degree of civility at Climate Audit.  OTOH, I do agree 100% with the point that there must be negative feedbacks which kick in at some point, and most probably are already at work.  The fact is that CO2 levels in the recent past (geologically speaking) are near the minimum which is possible.  Any lower and life is negatively impacted.  The first couple of CO2 doublings are primarily going to result in shifting the water cycle to adjust.  Part of the problem, as far as explaining this to AGW zealots, is that a lot of the adjustment involves moving larger amounts of heat poleward and this can be called Global Warming as opposed to Regional Adjustment to Warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5846</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5846</guid>
		<description>Man, one of the hunters is (to be mild) a foul mouthed bafoon. The other hunter has an intellectual approach to his or her writing.

Now to my reason to post. I currently know where to acquire a tree trunk about 6 or 7 feet tall and 5 or 6 feet wide. Are there any tree ring scientists or the like that I can approach with this as to examine the growth cycles with recorded weather reports for the 4 corners area. This trunk was cut down last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, one of the hunters is (to be mild) a foul mouthed bafoon. The other hunter has an intellectual approach to his or her writing.</p>
<p>Now to my reason to post. I currently know where to acquire a tree trunk about 6 or 7 feet tall and 5 or 6 feet wide. Are there any tree ring scientists or the like that I can approach with this as to examine the growth cycles with recorded weather reports for the 4 corners area. This trunk was cut down last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5812</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5812</guid>
		<description>Pogo,
The troll shifts names so quickly and so often, it is clear I made a mistake.
Please do accept my apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogo,<br />
The troll shifts names so quickly and so often, it is clear I made a mistake.<br />
Please do accept my apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pogo</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5809</link>
		<dc:creator>Pogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5809</guid>
		<description>To &quot;hunter&quot; at October 17, 2009, 8:54am. (presumably the real one)...

Damn you Sir! I insist that you retract your statement grouping me with the fake hunter / scientist / jennifer. There is no bloody way that I could be considered a &quot;true believer&quot;, you only need to go back through my other (admittedly sporadic) postings on this site.

Actually, I&#039;m slightly at a loss as to how you came to include me with such undesirable company. My first posting in this thread, accusing the fake hunter of failing the Turing test (ie being a bot-like response that could in no way be mistaken for having human intelligence behind it, a la &quot;eliza&quot;) should surely indicate that I&#039;m not a follower of said person/bot. Indeed, I&#039;ve taken it to task in the past for its apparent failure to understand the difference between feedback and amplification.

Rant over.

 
After posting a rather snarky response to &quot;Stevo&quot; it did occur to me that he might have been accusing me of &quot;failing the retard test&quot; as a backhanded complement, ie that I&#039;m not a retard... If that was the case I apologise wholeheartedly and can only say that the whooshing sound as it went over my head only became apparent a bit too late! :-)  (Maybe it was a very scraped pass).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;hunter&#8221; at October 17, 2009, 8:54am. (presumably the real one)&#8230;</p>
<p>Damn you Sir! I insist that you retract your statement grouping me with the fake hunter / scientist / jennifer. There is no bloody way that I could be considered a &#8220;true believer&#8221;, you only need to go back through my other (admittedly sporadic) postings on this site.</p>
<p>Actually, I&#8217;m slightly at a loss as to how you came to include me with such undesirable company. My first posting in this thread, accusing the fake hunter of failing the Turing test (ie being a bot-like response that could in no way be mistaken for having human intelligence behind it, a la &#8220;eliza&#8221;) should surely indicate that I&#8217;m not a follower of said person/bot. Indeed, I&#8217;ve taken it to task in the past for its apparent failure to understand the difference between feedback and amplification.</p>
<p>Rant over.</p>
<p>After posting a rather snarky response to &#8220;Stevo&#8221; it did occur to me that he might have been accusing me of &#8220;failing the retard test&#8221; as a backhanded complement, ie that I&#8217;m not a retard&#8230; If that was the case I apologise wholeheartedly and can only say that the whooshing sound as it went over my head only became apparent a bit too late! <img src='http://www.climate-skeptic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Maybe it was a very scraped pass).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5805</link>
		<dc:creator>hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5805</guid>
		<description>Clearly when pressed on the impossibility of positive feedbacks dominating the climate system, the true believers as represented by Hunter/Pogo/scientist have no rational answer.
But that, of course, implies that our favorite troll has a choice between rational and irrational responses, for which there is no evidence at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly when pressed on the impossibility of positive feedbacks dominating the climate system, the true believers as represented by Hunter/Pogo/scientist have no rational answer.<br />
But that, of course, implies that our favorite troll has a choice between rational and irrational responses, for which there is no evidence at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pogo</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5798</link>
		<dc:creator>Pogo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5798</guid>
		<description>@Stevo: &quot;Pogo… you fail the retard test.&quot;.

Thanks. I&#039;m glad to hear it. You however, I assume, have passed it and are therefore a genuine, qualified, certificated, retard.

Have a nice day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stevo: &#8220;Pogo… you fail the retard test.&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks. I&#8217;m glad to hear it. You however, I assume, have passed it and are therefore a genuine, qualified, certificated, retard.</p>
<p>Have a nice day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5797</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5797</guid>
		<description> I was kind of getting used to the troll being gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was kind of getting used to the troll being gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5794</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5794</guid>
		<description>Pogo... you fail the retard test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogo&#8230; you fail the retard test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyjuggler0</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2009/10/phoenix-climate-presentation-nov-10.html/comment-page-1#comment-5792</link>
		<dc:creator>happyjuggler0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climate-skeptic.com/?p=1339#comment-5792</guid>
		<description>Pogo, you just made my day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pogo, you just made my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

