Comments on: The Wrong Tree

By: hunter

hunter — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:54:46 +0000

“I understand the author has better things to do with his time than monitor this blog” – well then he shouldn’t be writing it should he? He has missed the entire point of blogs and would be much better off just publishing static web pages.

By: John Galt

John Galt — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:12:16 +0000

It is unfortunate that some immature people can’t control themselves. It’s well known the comments on this blog aren’t monitored. In the past, it was frequently a natural global warming denier who wrote a lot of flaming posts and impersonated others. And who’s to say that isn’t what’s happening now?

I understand the author has better things to do with his time than monitor this blog. May I suggest requiring registration and logon for posting?

By: hunter

hunter — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:40:40 +0000

Dr. Hansen,
Your handlers told you about trolling on the internet, but here you are again.

By: Will Nitschke

Will Nitschke — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:30:39 +0000

hunter – why are you calling me Jennifer, you fucktard?

By: hunter

hunter — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:59:04 +0000

kuhnkatand Wil,
I think you are both making excellent points.
Hansen is becoming positively pathological, as his latest spew indicates:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/18/jim-hansen-obama
If Obama is half as smart and perceptive as the media portrays him, he must be cringing everytime he hears stuff on climate.
By the way, in hte link Hansen makes three falsehoods. Can anyone here id them?

By: CarbonFever

CarbonFever — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:56:20 +0000

While everyone is getting personal, Jim Hansen is at it again …

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/18/jim-hansen-obama

By: Will Nitschke

Will Nitschke — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:40:16 +0000

Possibly this is not about a knocking a ‘straw man’ argument down but that AGW supporters are forced (at present) to make weaker and weaker proofs as temperature data is currently down on forecasts.

By: kuhnkat

kuhnkat — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:32:51 +0000

Juveniles will play.

Fortunately, they have limited intellect and patience and can not stick it out for long periods!!

I must not be a typical denier. I am willing to suggest that we have NOT had warming. Looking around the world at all the “indicators”, I can also match many of them with negative indicators. That is, regions do appear to have warmed. At the same time, other regions have cooled.

With the instrumental error, multiple adjustment regimens, political and monetary pressure on the studies, and simply lack of quality coverage, a definitive statement of trend is grandiose braggadocio!!!!

By: hunter

hunter — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:28:04 +0000

Jennifer,
No contradiction.
You are impersonating me for what someone else may have done to you.
That still leaves you acting immature.
I am not going to start impersonating anyone, nor tossing out examples of poor vocabulary.
My daughter is a neuroscience researcher, and she knows how to deal effectively with unpleasantries without use of your tools of choice.
I wish you well.
I hope the owner of this site puts in some minimal standards for posting.
This is a very good site, and if fundie AGW believers, as AGW continues to fall apart, start polluting threads and sites of climate realists, it will not improve the dissemination of good ideas.

By: sunsettommy

sunsettommy — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:25:10 +0000

The lack of a moderator here is the reason why jerks like scientist/jennifer whatever can screw up threads.It is apparent that the owner of this forum care less about it.

The reason why I stopped posted anything at my blog or forum from here.With the lack of interest in keeping the threads clean.I will not allow for the possibility of allowing such losers from contaminating my sites.

I kept the url for WEBSITE box blank on purpose.To keep away the loser trolls from getting to my places from here.I will now delete CLIMATE SKEPTIC from my links list.