” But when one considers errors, as one should, the observed temperatures and model predictions certainly have error ranges which overlap.”

I’m sorry, but, the expert modellers claim they only have SCENARIOS!!! They NEVER predict. 8>)

Now, you may ask why that may be. I believe it is because they realise that they are unable to map starting conditions closely enough to do a true prediction. I would add that their physics are a little lacking also.

If you can’t get your mind around their admissions that they can’t model clouds and precipitation well, you should really give it up!!

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.

I visit lots and lots of blogs. If a blog links me, I always read that post. Most bloggers do that.

I’ll probably return to this specific post to see if anyone happens to have questions about my graph.

I realize that this blog is skeptical of AGW, where as I believe the theory. But, all climate blogs have some overlap, and I think conversation is the best way to discover the areas of agreement, disagreement, and what’s in between.

I try to read every major climate blog at least once a week. I’ve read posts here, and I will continue to!

I don’t always comment because it takes time, and sometimes I don’t have anything in particular to add to a conversation. But, when I can add to the conversation, and the blog doesn’t moderate or put hurdles in the path of commenting, I comment.