<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On This Site&#8217;s Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cfdman</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>cfdman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW,  you bring out the best if folks.  I love this discussion!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW,  you bring out the best if folks.  I love this discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I read the comment threads, and then try to refine my arguments in my posts in the future&lt;/i&gt; - clearly not.  You&#039;ve just trotted out your false claims about Antarctica yet again, despite them being shown to be wrong at least the last three times you&#039;ve spouted them.  You&#039;re quite simply a liar.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I read the comment threads, and then try to refine my arguments in my posts in the future</i> &#8211; clearly not.  You&#8217;ve just trotted out your false claims about Antarctica yet again, despite them being shown to be wrong at least the last three times you&#8217;ve spouted them.  You&#8217;re quite simply a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mesa Econoguy</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mesa Econoguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bullshit this tone is coarse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Signed,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Liberal fuckwad tool&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bullshit this tone is coarse.</p>
<p>Signed,</p>
<p>Liberal fuckwad tool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>TCO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/04/on-this-sites-c.html#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your allowing of comments including intemperate ones is great.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You DON&#039;T show much consideration of the implications of criticims of your points in later posts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, tone does hurt the impression of one&#039;s arguments.  But FUCK impression.  What matters is the points.  I&#039;m so sick of the happy horseshit neoliberal corporate blather.  Let&#039;s take some cutting facts and arguments and (insert rape joke).&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your allowing of comments including intemperate ones is great.</p>
<p>You DON&#8217;T show much consideration of the implications of criticims of your points in later posts.</p>
<p>Yes, tone does hurt the impression of one&#8217;s arguments.  But FUCK impression.  What matters is the points.  I&#8217;m so sick of the happy horseshit neoliberal corporate blather.  Let&#8217;s take some cutting facts and arguments and (insert rape joke).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

