Comments on: Media Coverge of Climate Exposed http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/media-coverge-o.html Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:03:00 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Scientist http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/04/media-coverge-o.html/comment-page-1#comment-1147 Scientist Thu, 03 Apr 2008 10:43:54 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/04/media-coverge-o.html #comment-1147 <p>No, temperatures have not been flat. You can only claim this by blatantly cherry-picking.</p> <p>And no, 98% of Antarctica has not cooled. The figure is 58%. I pointed this out before, with a link to the paper. But you just trot out the same old rubbish again. Why? Is it because you don't read comments, because you don't understand the paper I cited, because you have some other paper you believe (if so, which is it?), or because you are deliberately being dishonest?</p> No, temperatures have not been flat. You can only claim this by blatantly cherry-picking.

And no, 98% of Antarctica has not cooled. The figure is 58%. I pointed this out before, with a link to the paper. But you just trot out the same old rubbish again. Why? Is it because you don’t read comments, because you don’t understand the paper I cited, because you have some other paper you believe (if so, which is it?), or because you are deliberately being dishonest?

]]>