<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Description of the Climate Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo the Scot</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo the Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-916</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scientist, if you are going to use a name like that it would be beneficial to your arguements if you actually deployed some science.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The original thesis is actually wrong.  It is not the people of Europe who are so deferential to authority.  It is the political classes.  Few major political parties in any European nation actually oppose the ever greater sway of the EU.  As such the voter is effectively disenfranchised and made redundant.  The EU has decided that man-made climate change is real and that something must be done.  The national political parties follow behind.  What the people think is immaterial; in the EU system their role is to obey and pay up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chris Mumby makes some valid points, although I think the technical point about executions was that the FEDERAL government had only executed 400 people, rather than that the States had in aggregate executed many thousands.  Certainly we have fought just about every nation on the surface of the planet, yet still manage to be reasonably friendly towards most these days!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientist, if you are going to use a name like that it would be beneficial to your arguements if you actually deployed some science.</p>
<p>The original thesis is actually wrong.  It is not the people of Europe who are so deferential to authority.  It is the political classes.  Few major political parties in any European nation actually oppose the ever greater sway of the EU.  As such the voter is effectively disenfranchised and made redundant.  The EU has decided that man-made climate change is real and that something must be done.  The national political parties follow behind.  What the people think is immaterial; in the EU system their role is to obey and pay up.</p>
<p>Chris Mumby makes some valid points, although I think the technical point about executions was that the FEDERAL government had only executed 400 people, rather than that the States had in aggregate executed many thousands.  Certainly we have fought just about every nation on the surface of the planet, yet still manage to be reasonably friendly towards most these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mumby</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mumby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-915</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As a UK climate sceptic - I&#039;m a bit sad at the level of debate in this article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It was not blind deference that led Europe to be led by Napoleon, it was French military might.  Which Europe (England and Prussians mainly) overturned in 1815 (Anyone heard of Waterloo? or the Peninsular War? or the failed French invasion of Russia?)   There was also WW1 and WW2 were Europe/UK/commonwealth, with the help of the late entrant USA, overturned the aggression of Hitler etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A quick check on Wiki states that the USA (&amp; it&#039;s predecessors) has executed over 15,000 - not the 400 mentioned by Aidiran.  Sure Wiki can be wrong and I&#039;m sure that the UK has executed many thousands more - but stop been so pious and defensive.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The USA has invaded many countries Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the Philippines - the UK has invaded more....  but that was a different time and not hugely relevant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m a fan of America - but America has made many recent decisions that has turned some European public opinion against it - the Invasion of Iraq been the major failure of US foreign policy.  I will not vote for the current shower in power in the UK because of the Iraq war.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please stop the anti-European snobbery and get on with the climate debate. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a UK climate sceptic &#8211; I&#8217;m a bit sad at the level of debate in this article.</p>
<p>It was not blind deference that led Europe to be led by Napoleon, it was French military might.  Which Europe (England and Prussians mainly) overturned in 1815 (Anyone heard of Waterloo? or the Peninsular War? or the failed French invasion of Russia?)   There was also WW1 and WW2 were Europe/UK/commonwealth, with the help of the late entrant USA, overturned the aggression of Hitler etc.</p>
<p>A quick check on Wiki states that the USA (&#038; it&#8217;s predecessors) has executed over 15,000 &#8211; not the 400 mentioned by Aidiran.  Sure Wiki can be wrong and I&#8217;m sure that the UK has executed many thousands more &#8211; but stop been so pious and defensive.</p>
<p>The USA has invaded many countries Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the Philippines &#8211; the UK has invaded more&#8230;.  but that was a different time and not hugely relevant.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of America &#8211; but America has made many recent decisions that has turned some European public opinion against it &#8211; the Invasion of Iraq been the major failure of US foreign policy.  I will not vote for the current shower in power in the UK because of the Iraq war.</p>
<p>Please stop the anti-European snobbery and get on with the climate debate. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDK</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>TDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-914</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tom Wolfe (after Jean-François Revel): &lt;i&gt;the dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As a lifelong European I can confirm that the default posture for most Europeans to any perceived problem is to demand &quot;what is the government going to do about it&quot;. Indeed, given Scientist has probably devoted his waking hours to making this very demand of his government, he fits the pattern. I don&#039;t think this signifies a respect (or deference) for authority so much as helplessness or apathy. We might debate as to what caused (or exacerbated) this attitude but it&#039;s certainly there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not so sure that the US is that far behind though. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Wolfe (after Jean-François Revel): <i>the dark night of fascism is always descending in the United States and yet lands only in Europe</i></p>
<p>As a lifelong European I can confirm that the default posture for most Europeans to any perceived problem is to demand &#8220;what is the government going to do about it&#8221;. Indeed, given Scientist has probably devoted his waking hours to making this very demand of his government, he fits the pattern. I don&#8217;t think this signifies a respect (or deference) for authority so much as helplessness or apathy. We might debate as to what caused (or exacerbated) this attitude but it&#8217;s certainly there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not so sure that the US is that far behind though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kriek Jooste</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Kriek Jooste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-913</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The US also has it&#039;s flaws compared to Europe.  For example, the US has Al Gore.  I don&#039;t think a debate about which nations are better is that constructive in a climate related debate, though it is clear that government centred anti-human policies regarding environmental theory goes down well with the left and it&#039;s also true some nations are traditionally more keen to accept things this way.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US also has it&#8217;s flaws compared to Europe.  For example, the US has Al Gore.  I don&#8217;t think a debate about which nations are better is that constructive in a climate related debate, though it is clear that government centred anti-human policies regarding environmental theory goes down well with the left and it&#8217;s also true some nations are traditionally more keen to accept things this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adirian</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-912</link>
		<dc:creator>Adirian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-912</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;...kills its own citizens...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Yup.  It deprives them of one of their rights in exceedingly rare and extreme cases - in case you weren&#039;t aware, the Federal Government has executed fewer than four hundred people in the whole of its existence.  I challenge you to find a European power that can make that claim.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;...has by far the largest military budget in the world...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Has by far the biggest economy of the world, and Europe to boot depends on the United States to maintain global peace; United States forces make up the great majority of the UN military forces, and permit European nations to maintain smaller armies in turn, because after all they can suck at the teat of the United States&#039; protection.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;invades other nations frequently&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Yup.  Hell, we&#039;ve invaded all of Europe, what with our military bases all over it.  And when we don&#039;t invade a nation that EUROPE thinks needs invading, Europe starts condemning us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;has a long history of backing fascist regimes&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;- Yup, we do.  We&#039;re backing Britain, Spain, France, Norway, Sweden... why, virtually every nationally socialist country that side of the Atlantic.  Remember, Mussolini described Fascism thus:  The glorious merging of corporate and government power.  This describes - every - single - European - nation.  The United States has some croneyism going on, but nothing to the way Europe handles its corporations, from Volkswagen in Germany to British Telecom in Britain.  There is no clear line of distinction between church, government, and business, in most anywhere in Europe.  The only company the United States treats the way Europe treats all of its industries is the US Post Office.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Again, talk to any European who has left Europe for the States.  I have, many times over.  Invariably they describe the nation they&#039;re from, no matter the nation it is, thus: Society, and more particularly its &quot;representatives,&quot; are what government respects.  The individual doesn&#039;t matter, only the society.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;kills its own citizens&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>- Yup.  It deprives them of one of their rights in exceedingly rare and extreme cases &#8211; in case you weren&#8217;t aware, the Federal Government has executed fewer than four hundred people in the whole of its existence.  I challenge you to find a European power that can make that claim.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;has by far the largest military budget in the world&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>- Has by far the biggest economy of the world, and Europe to boot depends on the United States to maintain global peace; United States forces make up the great majority of the UN military forces, and permit European nations to maintain smaller armies in turn, because after all they can suck at the teat of the United States&#8217; protection.</p>
<p>&#8220;invades other nations frequently&#8221;</p>
<p>- Yup.  Hell, we&#8217;ve invaded all of Europe, what with our military bases all over it.  And when we don&#8217;t invade a nation that EUROPE thinks needs invading, Europe starts condemning us.</p>
<p>&#8220;has a long history of backing fascist regimes&#8221;</p>
<p>- Yup, we do.  We&#8217;re backing Britain, Spain, France, Norway, Sweden&#8230; why, virtually every nationally socialist country that side of the Atlantic.  Remember, Mussolini described Fascism thus:  The glorious merging of corporate and government power.  This describes &#8211; every &#8211; single &#8211; European &#8211; nation.  The United States has some croneyism going on, but nothing to the way Europe handles its corporations, from Volkswagen in Germany to British Telecom in Britain.  There is no clear line of distinction between church, government, and business, in most anywhere in Europe.  The only company the United States treats the way Europe treats all of its industries is the US Post Office.</p>
<p>Again, talk to any European who has left Europe for the States.  I have, many times over.  Invariably they describe the nation they&#8217;re from, no matter the nation it is, thus: Society, and more particularly its &#8220;representatives,&#8221; are what government respects.  The individual doesn&#8217;t matter, only the society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-911</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sadly what you say in your piece rings true certainly in the U.K. &lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes the feeling I have is in some small or maybe large way how those who opposed the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930&#039;s. Whilst most around me have fallen for the myth of agw including most ordinary people, intelligent people and intellectuals and perhaps more importantly the mainstream media it is virtually impossible to displace this very easily digestable notion.&lt;br /&gt;
Listen to any talk show on local and national radio. The host will inevitably scoff at those callers who raise any doubts on the recieved view on this subject. They will ask for credentials of those who express the opposite opinion and try to humiliate them saying that they are not qualified to hold those views. When someone who has fallen for the hysteria tells the host of their views then he will nod sagely and thank the caller and take the traffic or weather news.&lt;br /&gt;
That on a small scale but on the wider scale this is being played out day after day after day. The first comment posted sums my point up rather succinctly by their pavlovian response to your piece.&lt;br /&gt;
What is facinating (I have to find this whole debate facinating otherwise I would get very depressed) is how a brand new industry has evolved on the world stage. Carbon credits being one. Now that the beast has been unleashed on us all there will be too much money to be lost for those who have invested in these schemes to at the days end stand up and realise that agw doesn&#039;t exist. Turkeys voting for Christmas in other words.&lt;br /&gt;
One thing I disagree with is your slant that the American public would not stand for this sort of thing. In Liberal America it is de rigeur to believe in the climate change myth hence the increased production of biofuel and the hike in prices we have witnessed over the past year.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly what you say in your piece rings true certainly in the U.K. <br />
Sometimes the feeling I have is in some small or maybe large way how those who opposed the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930&#8242;s. Whilst most around me have fallen for the myth of agw including most ordinary people, intelligent people and intellectuals and perhaps more importantly the mainstream media it is virtually impossible to displace this very easily digestable notion.<br />
Listen to any talk show on local and national radio. The host will inevitably scoff at those callers who raise any doubts on the recieved view on this subject. They will ask for credentials of those who express the opposite opinion and try to humiliate them saying that they are not qualified to hold those views. When someone who has fallen for the hysteria tells the host of their views then he will nod sagely and thank the caller and take the traffic or weather news.<br />
That on a small scale but on the wider scale this is being played out day after day after day. The first comment posted sums my point up rather succinctly by their pavlovian response to your piece.<br />
What is facinating (I have to find this whole debate facinating otherwise I would get very depressed) is how a brand new industry has evolved on the world stage. Carbon credits being one. Now that the beast has been unleashed on us all there will be too much money to be lost for those who have invested in these schemes to at the days end stand up and realise that agw doesn&#8217;t exist. Turkeys voting for Christmas in other words.<br />
One thing I disagree with is your slant that the American public would not stand for this sort of thing. In Liberal America it is de rigeur to believe in the climate change myth hence the increased production of biofuel and the hike in prices we have witnessed over the past year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>MG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The point remains that the author of this blog wouldn&#039;t know good science if it poked him in the eye. His views on climate are driven only by his political fears and prejudices.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I suppose your shrill comments and ad hominem attacks AREN&#039;T politically motivated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The point remains that the author of this blog wouldn&#8217;t know good science if it poked him in the eye. His views on climate are driven only by his political fears and prejudices.</i></p>
<p>I suppose your shrill comments and ad hominem attacks AREN&#8217;T politically motivated.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Fin</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Fin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Europe will soon be controlled by militant muslim immigrants, enforcing Sharia law to Europeans cowering in their own homes.  As gangs of muslim youth roam the streets, gang-raping teenage girls and burning cars, Europe&#039;s passivity comes home to roost.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europe will soon be controlled by militant muslim immigrants, enforcing Sharia law to Europeans cowering in their own homes.  As gangs of muslim youth roam the streets, gang-raping teenage girls and burning cars, Europe&#8217;s passivity comes home to roost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-908</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh wow.  Had no idea that so many posters here were so deeply prejudiced.  What a pathetic sight, to see people really honestly believe that the United States is somehow so superior.  Your government kills its own citizens, has by far the largest military budget in the world, invades other nations frequently, and has a long history of backing fascist regimes, and you think Europeans are somehow the ones who are keen on totalitarianism.  Ha!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The point remains that the author of this blog wouldn&#039;t know good science if it poked him in the eye.  His views on climate are driven only by his political fears and prejudices.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow.  Had no idea that so many posters here were so deeply prejudiced.  What a pathetic sight, to see people really honestly believe that the United States is somehow so superior.  Your government kills its own citizens, has by far the largest military budget in the world, invades other nations frequently, and has a long history of backing fascist regimes, and you think Europeans are somehow the ones who are keen on totalitarianism.  Ha!</p>
<p>The point remains that the author of this blog wouldn&#8217;t know good science if it poked him in the eye.  His views on climate are driven only by his political fears and prejudices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adirian</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/03/great-descripti.html/comment-page-1#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Adirian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/03/great-descripti.html#comment-907</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Scientist - talk to any individual, any individual at all, who moved from Europe to the United States, and ask them their opinion of Europe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Blind deference is, in fact, incorrect.  It&#039;s wide-eyed deference.  Europeans, on the whole, actively look to authority figures to increase their authority - they don&#039;t merely accept dictation, they seek it.  Any and every public problem is expected to be solved by government figures, in spite of an abyssal record.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Unites States is singularly unique in its approach to authority - the British parliament can pass any law, can overturn any &quot;right,&quot; by its authority alone.  There are no guaranteed rights in Britain, and it is still positively liberal - classically liberal, by which I mean libertarian - compared to every other European state, with the possible and sometimes exception of Ireland.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientist &#8211; talk to any individual, any individual at all, who moved from Europe to the United States, and ask them their opinion of Europe.</p>
<p>Blind deference is, in fact, incorrect.  It&#8217;s wide-eyed deference.  Europeans, on the whole, actively look to authority figures to increase their authority &#8211; they don&#8217;t merely accept dictation, they seek it.  Any and every public problem is expected to be solved by government figures, in spite of an abyssal record.</p>
<p>The Unites States is singularly unique in its approach to authority &#8211; the British parliament can pass any law, can overturn any &#8220;right,&#8221; by its authority alone.  There are no guaranteed rights in Britain, and it is still positively liberal &#8211; classically liberal, by which I mean libertarian &#8211; compared to every other European state, with the possible and sometimes exception of Ireland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

