Comments on: More Evidence Climate Scientists Can’t Measure Anything Correctly http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:51:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: litesong http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-815 litesong Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:23:54 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-815 <p>Poor Exxon can't pay to distribute their overwhelming data that pollution doesn't effect the earth in any way, shape or form. They are outspent 1000 to one. You mean they are so poor that they can only give their retiring heads $400 million? Such poorness stabs me to my heart's core!</p> <p> Oh, save me from evil scientists who sell their souls & make up research papers to gain their massive $30,000 research grants. Yes, its so easy to buy off scientists who have poured their life long efforts into truth seeking. Just $30,000 & scientists are in your hands. Hey, maybe you don't even have to pay them $30,000!</p> <p>Woe is me! Exxon is such a pauper! Let's start a poor box for Exxon. </p> <p> </p> Poor Exxon can’t pay to distribute their overwhelming data that pollution doesn’t effect the earth in any way, shape or form. They are outspent 1000 to one. You mean they are so poor that they can only give their retiring heads $400 million? Such poorness stabs me to my heart’s core!

Oh, save me from evil scientists who sell their souls & make up research papers to gain their massive $30,000 research grants. Yes, its so easy to buy off scientists who have poured their life long efforts into truth seeking. Just $30,000 & scientists are in your hands. Hey, maybe you don’t even have to pay them $30,000!

Woe is me! Exxon is such a pauper! Let’s start a poor box for Exxon.

]]> By: MCF http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-814 MCF Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:23:25 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-814 <p>@Mike - The power of Google...</p> <p>PBMR = pebble bed molecular reactor a/k/a PBR</p> <p>See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMR</p> @Mike – The power of Google…

PBMR = pebble bed molecular reactor a/k/a PBR

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_bed_reactor and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBMR

]]> By: aaron http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-813 aaron Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:36:53 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-813 <p>I wouldn't worry too much about the sun. The attribution relies on the same spurious feedbacks and lags as GHGs. My guess is that both effects are much smaller than we think.</p> I wouldn’t worry too much about the sun. The attribution relies on the same spurious feedbacks and lags as GHGs. My guess is that both effects are much smaller than we think.

]]> By: Scientist http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-812 Scientist Sat, 01 Mar 2008 18:09:43 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-812 <p><i>average Americans, who are far less likely to think in lockstep with their country's "elites" than are Europeans</i> - what a thoroughly, thoroughly stupid thing to say.</p> average Americans, who are far less likely to think in lockstep with their country’s “elites” than are Europeans – what a thoroughly, thoroughly stupid thing to say.

]]> By: Pops http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-811 Pops Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:11:37 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-811 <p>The retiring Dr. Joanne Simpson tells it like it is (from Pielke Sr.'s web site): "Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receive any funding, I can speak quite frankly." It isn't ExxonMobil that's distorting the process.</p> The retiring Dr. Joanne Simpson tells it like it is (from Pielke Sr.’s web site): “Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receive any funding, I can speak quite frankly.” It isn’t ExxonMobil that’s distorting the process.

]]> By: TCO http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-810 TCO Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:56:48 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-810 <p>It's called the law of diminishing returns, Houston office shitferbrains.</p> It’s called the law of diminishing returns, Houston office shitferbrains.

]]> By: Mike http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-809 Mike Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:09:15 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-809 <p>Bill:<br /> What is a PBMR?<br /> Thanks</p> Bill:
What is a PBMR?
Thanks

]]> By: Chris, Baildon UK http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-808 Chris, Baildon UK Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:35:22 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-808 <p>"who are far less likely to think in lockstep with their country's "elites" than are Europeans"</p> <p>Please don't write off all Europeans as follows to our great leaders (alleged) wisdom......</p> “who are far less likely to think in lockstep with their country’s “elites” than are Europeans”

Please don’t write off all Europeans as follows to our great leaders (alleged) wisdom……

]]> By: morganovich http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-807 morganovich Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:43:33 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-807 <p>“Nobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of facts on how dangerous (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” -al gore</p> <p>there it is. straight from the horse's mouth.</p> <p>So it’s fine to overstate a problem to make sure everyone gets on board to solve it? He has just told us he plans to lie to us and feels justified in so doing. (and apparently the IPCC agrees with him) And still he is considered credible? This beggars belief. it's egocentrism is breathtaking. To hear him accuse “deniers” of “propaganda” reeks of nearly as much hypocrisy as the $30,000/year electrical bill for his home. His cries against the deniers echo martin luther calling for the head of Copernicus. <br /> </p> “Nobody is interested in solutions if they don’t think there’s a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of facts on how dangerous (global warming) is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” -al gore

there it is. straight from the horse’s mouth.

So it’s fine to overstate a problem to make sure everyone gets on board to solve it? He has just told us he plans to lie to us and feels justified in so doing. (and apparently the IPCC agrees with him) And still he is considered credible? This beggars belief. it’s egocentrism is breathtaking. To hear him accuse “deniers” of “propaganda” reeks of nearly as much hypocrisy as the $30,000/year electrical bill for his home. His cries against the deniers echo martin luther calling for the head of Copernicus.

]]> By: bill-tb http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html/comment-page-1#comment-806 bill-tb Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:43:11 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/02/more-evidence-c.html#comment-806 <p>I liked this comment <blockquote>“You can’t succeed just out of conservation because then you won’t have economic development,” Brilliant explains. “Find a way to make electricity — not to cut back on it but to have more of it than you ever dreamed of.”</blockquote>probably forced Al Gore to blow a gasket. You know the goals of the alarmists are to contain people in a limited energy bubble, google seems to have other ideas, as do most rational people.</p> <p>It is only the irrational alarmists who continue to dance while the obvious solution to solving the energy problem while at the same time reducing CO2 is shunned -- Nuclear power. In particular the newer PBMRs are showing great promise. If the predictions are true about the quite sun, we should get cracking now to solve the problem, we will need the energy to keep warm. I also agree that transmission and switching of power needs a major upgrade to improve reliability and flexibility.</p> I liked this comment
“You can’t succeed just out of conservation because then you won’t have economic development,” Brilliant explains. “Find a way to make electricity — not to cut back on it but to have more of it than you ever dreamed of.”

probably forced Al Gore to blow a gasket. You know the goals of the alarmists are to contain people in a limited energy bubble, google seems to have other ideas, as do most rational people.

It is only the irrational alarmists who continue to dance while the obvious solution to solving the energy problem while at the same time reducing CO2 is shunned — Nuclear power. In particular the newer PBMRs are showing great promise. If the predictions are true about the quite sun, we should get cracking now to solve the problem, we will need the energy to keep warm. I also agree that transmission and switching of power needs a major upgrade to improve reliability and flexibility.

]]>