<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Climate Short:  Don&#8217;t Panic &#8212; Flaws in Catastrophic Global Warming Forecasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html/comment-page-1#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html #comment-434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been trying to apply the math here, but I run into some problems. First, if Temperature change= dT/(1-f), I can&#039;t input a value of exactly 1, for reasons that should be obvious. Second, when I input values greater than one for f, the whole thing flips and goes negative, implying that the &quot;tipping point&quot; actually refers to runaway cooling. I don&#039;t get this. Do you mean when you describe the feedback that (1-f)&gt;1 means run away, ie, negative values of f? I&#039;m in need of help here.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to apply the math here, but I run into some problems. First, if Temperature change= dT/(1-f), I can&#8217;t input a value of exactly 1, for reasons that should be obvious. Second, when I input values greater than one for f, the whole thing flips and goes negative, implying that the &#8220;tipping point&#8221; actually refers to runaway cooling. I don&#8217;t get this. Do you mean when you describe the feedback that (1-f)>1 means run away, ie, negative values of f? I&#8217;m in need of help here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillBodell</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html/comment-page-1#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>BillBodell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html #comment-433</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To avoid a cheap shot, you&#039;ll want to change your graph of observed tempuratures. The RSS data was corrected on January 16th (2007 was too low). The AGW crowd is running around accusing everybody that used perfectly good data as of a week ago of being stupid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great video. However I, unlike the unwashed masses, would like one 10 hours long.  &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To avoid a cheap shot, you&#8217;ll want to change your graph of observed tempuratures. The RSS data was corrected on January 16th (2007 was too low). The AGW crowd is running around accusing everybody that used perfectly good data as of a week ago of being stupid.</p>
<p>Great video. However I, unlike the unwashed masses, would like one 10 hours long.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html/comment-page-1#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html #comment-432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The paper that shows that as much as half of recent warming maybe due to biases in the record is by Patrick Michaels and Ross McKitrick. Steve McIntyre was not involved, to my knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paper that shows that as much as half of recent warming maybe due to biases in the record is by Patrick Michaels and Ross McKitrick. Steve McIntyre was not involved, to my knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreamin</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html/comment-page-1#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>dreamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/new-climate-sho.html #comment-431</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great video!!&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
