<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dearieme</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>dearieme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html#comment-357</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This &quot;climate science&quot; is so god-awful that I wonder about a sociological explanation.  Is its root just a surplus of physicists indulging in make-work?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;climate science&#8221; is so god-awful that I wonder about a sociological explanation.  Is its root just a surplus of physicists indulging in make-work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2008/01/more-on-feedbac-2.html#comment-356</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems to me that if you take a system and say &#039;this system&#039;s future behavior is dominated by positive feedback&#039; then it surely doesn&#039;t take much to then prove the system will head into a catastrophe. It&#039;s all down to the basic assumption; which is highly suspect.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that if you take a system and say &#8216;this system&#8217;s future behavior is dominated by positive feedback&#8217; then it surely doesn&#8217;t take much to then prove the system will head into a catastrophe. It&#8217;s all down to the basic assumption; which is highly suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

