Comments on: I’m Glad Global Warming Catastrophists Have Science on their Side, Or Else I Might Suspect This Was Ridiculous

By: litesong

litesong — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:49:30 +0000

dreamin...Get your copy of Geophysical Research Letters & prove Prof Jacobson wrong.

By: MDM

MDM — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:29:19 +0000

Here’s a related article by William Briggs:
http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/02/01/zombies-no-joke-global-warming-can-cause-anything/

By: dreamin

dreamin — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:01:14 +0000

The obvious way to test his argument is to look at lung disease rates in two similar populations, one of which lives in a slightly warmer (but otherwise similar) area.

I feel confident in predicting that you won't find any significant difference.

"Prof. Mark Jacobson needs no greenhouse gases money."

Comon. What professor in the sciences doesn't need funding? What professor doesn't want attention? And what better way to get funding and attention than to tell the Emporer how wonderful his new clothes are?

By: litesong

litesong — Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:53:14 +0000

Prof. Mark Jacobson needs no greenhouse gases money. His forefront & landmark study on detrimental effects of E85 bio-fuels throwing cold water on Federal gov't subsidies for said fuels, marks his courage.

His ozone & carbon dioxide studies are nearly an extrapolation of his E85 studies, therefore such studies by Prof. Jacobson are dearly welcomed. As for razzing him, get to the end of the line. Others have already demeaned his studies of the past. However, his knowledge is deep & he has silenced his detractors. So if you stay in line, you will face him...soon.

Reuters didn't publish his data. Geophysical Research Letters has Prof. Jacobson's research. Again his study is landmark & the first of hopefully many studies.