Comments on: A Brief Window into How the IPCC Does Science http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: DirtCrashr http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-257 DirtCrashr Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:07:21 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-257 <p>Had to <a href="http://anthroblogogy.blogspot.com/2007/12/socialist-scientisms-5-year-planned.html" rel="nofollow">blog this</a>, it's too important to pass-up.</p> Had to blog this, it’s too important to pass-up.

]]> By: Peter http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-256 Peter Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:20:37 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-256 <p>Dearieme: Nope, it's seal levels.. don't you know that the seals are drowning too, just like the polar bears.. ;)</p> Dearieme: Nope, it’s seal levels.. don’t you know that the seals are drowning too, just like the polar bears.. ;)

]]> By: WP http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-255 WP Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:31:35 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-255 <p>Great blog! More proof of how biased some scientists are when their ideas are at stake. </p> <p>By the way, possibly you meant "sea level" in the first sentence rather than "seal level"?</p> Great blog! More proof of how biased some scientists are when their ideas are at stake.

By the way, possibly you meant “sea level” in the first sentence rather than “seal level”?

]]> By: dearieme http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-254 dearieme Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:10:03 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-254 <p>Flat lines, eh? May I be the first to dub it "Global Tepiding"?</p> Flat lines, eh? May I be the first to dub it “Global Tepiding”?

]]> By: MM http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-253 MM Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:29:22 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-253 <p>That's how settled science works: observation must be corrected to have continued...um...settledness.</p> That’s how settled science works: observation must be corrected to have continued…um…settledness.

]]> By: MM http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-252 MM Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:28:46 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-252 <p>That's how settled science works: observation must be corrected to have continued...um...settledness.</p> That’s how settled science works: observation must be corrected to have continued…um…settledness.

]]> By: Al Fin http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/12/a-brief-window.html/comment-page-1#comment-251 Al Fin Thu, 06 Dec 2007 01:06:38 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/12/a-brief-window.html #comment-251 <p>Very interesting. "Correction factors" have come in very handy over the years in making bad data behave for the climate science community. Remember: If it's for a good cause, it's not really cheating.</p> Very interesting. “Correction factors” have come in very handy over the years in making bad data behave for the climate science community. Remember: If it’s for a good cause, it’s not really cheating.

]]>