http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/the-splice.html Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:47:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/the-splice.html/comment-page-1#comment-174 John Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:19:02 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/the-splice.html #comment-174 <p>Excellent article. I'm going to link it.</p> Excellent article. I’m going to link it.

]]> http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/the-splice.html/comment-page-1#comment-173 gjehlickthedicksdfnleatmeajksdfa Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:46:50 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/the-splice.html #comment-173 <p>i agree with the above commetn climate science is observations and if scientists arent truly honest with wat they report then people wont trust scientists anymore</p> i agree with the above commetn climate science is observations and if scientists arent truly honest with wat they report then people wont trust scientists anymore

]]> http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/the-splice.html/comment-page-1#comment-172 dearieme Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:32:36 +0000 http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/the-splice.html #comment-172 <p>What keeps scientists honest is the fact that if they lie about an experimental result, they risk my repeating the experiment and proving them wrong. But Climate Science isn't a science in the sense of having controlled experiments; it depends on mere observations. So to keep the "scientists" honest, their observations must be made openly available for auditing. It's so fundamental a point that one would be justified in rejecting all "data" that fails to meet this test in a reasonable time.</p> What keeps scientists honest is the fact that if they lie about an experimental result, they risk my repeating the experiment and proving them wrong. But Climate Science isn’t a science in the sense of having controlled experiments; it depends on mere observations. So to keep the “scientists” honest, their observations must be made openly available for auditing. It’s so fundamental a point that one would be justified in rejecting all “data” that fails to meet this test in a reasonable time.

]]>