<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Signal to Noise Ratio in Measuring Temperature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: schober</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>schober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html#comment-149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;can you tell us where the graphs came from? or are they your own&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you tell us where the graphs came from? or are they your own</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morganovich</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>morganovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html#comment-148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;question on the temperature charts:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;have those been corrected for NASA&#039;s Y2K flaw or are they still the old data?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question on the temperature charts:</p>
<p>have those been corrected for NASA&#8217;s Y2K flaw or are they still the old data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html#comment-147</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Climate Audit is up for Best Science Blog 2007 and could sure use everyone&#039;s help in the voting...&lt;br /&gt;
http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Audit is up for Best Science Blog 2007 and could sure use everyone&#8217;s help in the voting&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php" rel="nofollow">http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike M.</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html#comment-146</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Climate Audit is up for Best Science Blog 2007 and could sure use everyone&#039;s help in the voting...&lt;br /&gt;
http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Audit is up for Best Science Blog 2007 and could sure use everyone&#8217;s help in the voting&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php" rel="nofollow">http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.climate-skeptic.com/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate-movie.com/wordpress/2007/11/signal-to-noise-2.html#comment-145</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for those graphs.&lt;br /&gt;
I remember the late Augie Auer (ex Professor of Meteorology) mentioning in a presentation last year, an example of temperature recording over 100 years. He mentioned, among others, a site near Christchurch New Zealand that showed no increase in temperature over 100 years. In fact I think there was slight cooling. This site had never been moved or surrounded by concrete or other building construction.&lt;br /&gt;
Ah yes...did a search and found this article,&lt;br /&gt;
http://dougierants.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-re-visited.html&lt;br /&gt;
which shows Invercargill with a 0.3 degree C drop in 60 years, and Christchurch with a flat trend over 140 years.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for those graphs.<br />
I remember the late Augie Auer (ex Professor of Meteorology) mentioning in a presentation last year, an example of temperature recording over 100 years. He mentioned, among others, a site near Christchurch New Zealand that showed no increase in temperature over 100 years. In fact I think there was slight cooling. This site had never been moved or surrounded by concrete or other building construction.<br />
Ah yes&#8230;did a search and found this article,<br />
<a href="http://dougierants.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-re-visited.html" rel="nofollow">http://dougierants.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-re-visited.html</a><br />
which shows Invercargill with a 0.3 degree C drop in 60 years, and Christchurch with a flat trend over 140 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

